Participatory Action Research

Maggie Walter.

Ch. 21 in "Social Research Methods," Falmer Press (London:2009) 

This article can be found by following the first link listed at: Maggie Walter PAR

This is a short paper where the author predominately draws attention to the criticism of the methodology of Participatory Action Research (PAR). Walter in essence believes that PAR is more an ideology of how research should be undertaken. Walter explains that unlike most other research methods, which tend to be timed undertakings with clear start and stop periods, PAR’s process continues until the problem is resolved thereby making it potentially repeat forever. Walter explains that PAR has been strongly criticised by social researchers because its participation, democracy and external ownership aspects can greatly reduce the validity of the research. In brief the author believes the lack of rigour makes PAR’s outcomes questionable in terms of being scientific, valid, reliable and usable.

I strongly disagree with one of Walter’s assertions that PAR’s claim of being a democratising force and means of achieving informed, practical change arising from issues at the grass roots is an arrogant declaration. In sum Walter’s paper is an explanation of the concepts behind PAR and numerically balances its pros versus its cons. Walter however goes to length explaining PAR’s disadvantages and creates the perception that she is a sceptic of the research method.  This paper is ideal as a non-intimidating guide for readers new to the various topics covered is this brisk read. The information is generic however well arranged and explained.

- Tawanda Gadzikwa